“More efficient workflows, unified know-how, and a more modern way of working”
Testers and jury? You and your team.
Once an ERP, CRM or SRM system is in place, it stays with you for many years. So the decision has to land. Our smart selection process makes usability, features and vendors tangible — in exactly the use cases your business actually runs.
How we choose
Instead of specs, screenings and RFPs, we run a process that puts your reality on stage — and lets vendors prove themselves on it.
We go deep — into your business model, your processes and the people who run them. Because we're not after a digital copy of the status quo. We're after a real step forward.
We write a screenplay. Your colleagues as protagonists, your processes as the set, your requirements as the drama. In the director's chair: you and the success of your company.
Who gets the leading role? Vendors present their solutions along the screenplay. On the jury: every project participant who'll actually work with the system later.
BAFA funding
PASSION4IT is registered as a consulting firm with BAFA, Germany's Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (consultant ID 222542). Through the federal program "Förderung von Unternehmensberatungen für KMU", consulting costs of up to €3,500 per engagement are subsidized — as a direct, non-repayable grant.
Whether your project qualifies is something we clarify in the first conversation. Review and approval rest with BAFA.
More about the program at BAFARequirements specs, vendor screenings, RFPs — lots of paper, little practice. The hands-on share in our Smart Software Selection is what makes the difference: your team understands what it's deciding and has fun while doing it. Our whitepaper walks through how it works in detail.
Download the whitepaper
We'd rather show you what a smart selection looks like with a real project. BarthHaas, the world market leader in hops trading, ran a supplier portal selection with us — step by step along our methodology.
Read the case studyWhat clients say about working with us.
“More efficient workflows, unified know-how, and a more modern way of working”
“Great accessibility and fast responsiveness”
“With professionalism and dedication, PASSION4IT is guiding us toward an efficient digital future.”
“What really stands out is the closeness and the eye-to-eye level at which PASSION4IT advised us — or rather, 'helped' us.”
“BarthHaas took a bold step into digitalization. With Passion4IT at our side, initial skepticism and hesitation quickly turned into enthusiasm for what is new and what comes next. Passion, indeed!”
“Working with Passion4IT stands out for strong IT expertise combined with a personable, human approach. This was a key factor in our project's success.”
“I have been involved in several software selection processes. But the methodology from Passion4IT genuinely surprised me.”
News
Getting started costs less than most people assume, because the first stage runs on licences you already pay for. What a realistic starting scope looks like, which four cost blocks actually arise, and where funding applies.
For most first AI applications in mid-sized companies it is, because those applications never touch your own data. Where data quality genuinely becomes a precondition, which five error types actually matter, and how to test it in a day.
Not the ones with the largest portfolio, but the ones who survey what exists before proposing a target picture and then stay through the implementation. Six selection criteria, the four phases of a modernisation, and how to spot a rip-and-replace pitch early.
For every business-critical system that stays with you for years: ERP, CRM, SRM, DMS and comparable solutions. The bigger the impact of the decision, the more a structured process pays off.
Instead of specs, vendor screenings and RFPs, we write a screenplay built on your real use cases. Vendors present their solution along that screenplay — your team sees the software in its own reality, not in a polished demo.
Yes. We don't recommend software because we're partnered with a vendor, but because it fits your processes. In the end, your jury makes the decision — not us.
Above all, the people who will work with the system every day. They star in the screenplay and sit on the jury at the casting. That produces a decision that holds up in daily work — and buy-in from day one.
Yes, if you want us to. From contract negotiation through project management to roll-out — as with BarthHaas, where we selected the supplier portal and implemented it together.
A fixed price, set before the engagement and based on the scope: the number of use cases in the screenplay, the number of vendors invited and the size of the jury. No day rates, no add-ons for sessions already in the screenplay. The offer states scope, dates and price on one page.
The duration depends on three things and nothing else: the number of use cases going into the screenplay, the number of vendors invited to the casting, and the calendar availability of your jury. In practice the limiting factor is almost always the jury, not our work. That is why the schedule sits in the offer and gets matched against the participants’ calendars at the start.
The screenplay with the documented use cases, each vendor’s assessment along those cases by the jury, a reasoned recommendation, and the negotiating basis for the contract. The screenplay stays usable after the decision, because it describes the requirements for the rollout and for later acceptance tests.
The consulting share may qualify for the BAFA funding programme for management consulting. The assessment basis is capped at 3,500 euros; in Bavaria the funding rate is 50 per cent, so a maximum grant of 1,750 euros. PASSION4IT is registered with BAFA as a consulting firm, consultant number 222542. For implementing the chosen software, the Bavarian Digitalbonus is the better route: Standard up to 7,500 euros and Plus up to 30,000 euros, each covering up to 50 per cent, directive running until 31 December 2027. Important in both cases: the application has to be filed before the engagement.
Enough for a genuine comparison, and few enough for the jury to assess each one with full attention. In practice that is three to five at the casting, chosen from a wider shortlist. More vendors at the casting lengthen the process without improving the decision, because assessment quality drops with every additional presentation.
Then that is a result, not a failure. In that case the screenplay shows exactly which use cases it breaks on, and one of three decisions follows: adjust the process, shorten the requirements, or postpone the selection until a requirement is settled. Deciding against every vendor is considerably cheaper than a rollout abandoned in its second year.
By three things: the processes the system is meant to support can be described; there are people who will work with it daily and have time for the jury; and management has decided that the investment will happen. Without the first, the processes need ordering first. Without the third, you get a comparison without a conclusion.
We hate tenders — so we write a screenplay instead. Curious what that looks like? In a strategy call we'll walk you through a real example from the German Mittelstand.